- Sun 01 February 2015
- Maths
- #conformal symmetry
I recently learned the difference between a cross-ratio invariant and a conformal ratio invariant, thanks to this Wikipedia entry.
Cross-Ratio
The cross-ratio is a projective invariant. Given the coordinates of four points on the complex plane, the cross-ratio is defined as
It is invariant under fractional linear transformations of the form
There is always the arbitrariness of how to define the cross-ratio. After all, there are \(4! = 24\) permutations of the coordinates, so you can argue that there are 24 possible cross-ratios for a given quartet of coordinates. However, note that if you swap two pairs you again obtain the same cross-ratio. That is,
This means that the 24 permutations must split into six inequivalent classes, each with four permutations related by the above relation. Representatives of each of these six inequivalent classes are:
As you can see, once the value of \(p\) is given, all possible permutations are fixed, so there is really one independent cross-ratio for any given quartet of coordinates.
Conformal Ratio
A conformal ratio is a conformal invariant. Given the coordinates of four points on \(D\)-dimensional space, a conformal ratio is defined as
where \((x_{1} - x_{3})^{2}\) means the square of the magnitude of the \(D\)-dimensional vector \(x_{1} - x_{3}\). In some sense, after a change of basis, the cross-ratio is the square root of a conformal ratio in two dimensions.
Again you encounter the arbitrariness of which of the \(4! = 24\) permutations to use for the definition of a conformal ratio. Just like the cross-ratio, you find that a conformal ratio is invariant under the exchange of two pairs of coordinates. So again you find six inequivalent classes. However, unlike the cross-ratio, you find that fixing the value of the conformal ratio for one class does not fix the other five classes:
Indeed, now you have two independent conformal ratios for a given quartet of coordinates.